Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application as his trial concluded. Court accorded permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw application is accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29608 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2014 Thana- KUSHESHWARASTHAN DistrictDarbhanga
======================================================
SUNIL CHAUPAL@ SUNIL KUMAR, aged about 26 years (Male), Son of Debu Chaupal, Resident of Village-Nadiyami, P.S.- Kuseshwar Asthan, Distt.Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Kedar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
withdraw the present application in connection with Kusheshwarasthan P.S. Case No. 135 of 2014, pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Biraul, Darbhanga as the trial of the petitioner has already been concluded.
Permission is accorded.
The present application has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U.K./-
U T
Sunil Chaupal
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
