Patna High Court rejected bail plea in a case involving offences under Sections 386 and 387 IPC regarding ransom demand. Petitioner had extensive criminal record pending against him.
Bail rejected; trial directed to conclude within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17454 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2018 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
LADDU PATEL S/o Late Muneshwar Prasad, Resident of MohallaMahendrau Shivpur, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rina Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ======================================================
... ... Opposite Party/s
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 29-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case in short is that the accused persons demanded rangdari from the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 1.7.2018. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Chargesheet has been submitted in the present case. It is submitted that no rangdari has been demanded by the petitioner. Except for suspicion, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case. No ransom has been paid in this case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17454 of 2019(3) dt.29-07-2019 2/2
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The petitioner has 19 criminal cases pending against him.
Considering the same, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 118 of 2018. The same is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial at the earliest preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Pankaj/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted bail in the case concerned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laddu Patel
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
