Allowed

Meera Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2019CR. MISC./29306/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CR. Misc. No. 29306 of 2019 wherein petitioners sought anticipatory/bail against arrest in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 447, 341, 323, 379, 354(a), 307 IPC arising from a land dispute. The High Court granted bail with sureties and specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions of close relative surety, cooperation in investigation and attendance in co

Meera Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29306 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2018 Thana- MANSI District-

¶3

Khagaria

¶4

======================================================

¶5

MEERA DEVI, aged about 55 years, female, W/o Kailash Thakur Resident of Village- Khutia, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

¶6

Poonam Devi, aged about 35 years, female, D/o Kailash Thakur Resident of Village- Khutia, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

¶7

Geeta Devi, aged about 45 years, female, W/o Late Jitendra Thakur Resident of Village- Khutia, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

¶8

Khooshboo Devi, aged about 28 years, female, W/o Raman Thakur Resident of Village- Khutia, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

¶9

Raman Thakur, aged about 25 years, male, S/o Late Jitendra Thakur Resident of Village- Khutia, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: Mr. J.K. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 25-07-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶17

APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 447, 341, 323, 379, 354(a), 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 237 of 2018.

¶19

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. It is submitted that a Title Suit

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29306 of 2019(4) dt.25-07-2019 2/3

¶21

No. 102 of 2018 between the same parties is pending in the Court of learned Sub-Judge 2^nd , Khagaria. The accusation of assault is general and omnibus without any specific assault attributed individually. Injuries resulting from the assault alleged against the petitioners are simple in nature. Out of the five petitioners four are ladies and all the petitioners claim clean antecedents.

¶22

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners’ arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 237 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶23

(i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives other than the petitioners herein.

¶24

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶25

(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(iv) That the petitioner nos. 1 to 4 shall be well

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29306 of 2019(4) dt.25-07-2019 3/3

¶28

represented in Court on each and every date during trial except as and when directed by the learned Court to be physically present and petitioner no. 5 shall remain physically present, and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶29

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶30

Ibrar//-

¶31

U T

Meera Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meera Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar @ Mallu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Aarti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Navnit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Chunkeshwar Soren @ Nunkeswar Soren @ Nerkeshwar Soren and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Chakradhar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar