The High Court dismissed a petition for review of an earlier order denying anticipatory bail, holding that seeking a review of such an order is impermissible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30082 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2014 Thana- ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BIHAR District- Patna
======================================================
NAVNIT KUMAR, aged about 59 years, male, Son of Late Chandrika Prasad Verma Resident of Village - Alkapuri, Gardanibagh, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt - Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 24-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30082 of 2019(3) dt.24-07-2019 2/2
there is no incriminating material has come against the petitioner in course of investigation.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review of an earlier order denying anticipatory bail is impermissible and should be allowed.
Navit Kumar
The State of Bihar
Economic Offence Unit
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
