Allowed

Tunnu @ Navlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Apr 2019CR. MISC./2917/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC and Arms Act, directing release upon completion of one year in custody upon furnishing bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on completion of one year in custody upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Tunnu @ Navlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2917 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2018 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Tunnu @ Navlesh Kumar Surendra Singh Resident of Village- Kurthoul Chakiya gopalchak, P.S-Parsa Bazar, Dist- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Matloob Rab ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

8 29-04-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶12

APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to make necessary correction in paragraph 3 of the application in the light of statement made in the supplementary affidavit in course of day.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 385, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The prosecution case in short is that while the informant was at home, the the accused persons called and fired at him due to which he sustained injury.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 8.8.2018. There is no allegation

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2917 of 2019(8) dt.29-04-2019 2/2

¶18

of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Chargesheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Due to accidental fire, the victim is said to have sustained injury. The petitioner had no intention to cause injury to the victim. It is further submitted that the petitioner may be released after completion of one year in custody.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, on completion of one year in custody , it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 19/2018.

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Tunnu @ Navlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tunnu @ Navlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantosh Yadav @ Mantosh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Pawan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chitranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shabbir Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar