Allowed

Pawan Yadav and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Apr 2019CR. MISC./8343/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to two petitioners charged with offences including rape and murder under the IPC. The court directed them to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each and to appear before the Court of C.J.M., Saharsa.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each to the satisfaction of the Court of C.J.M., Saharsa.

Pawan Yadav and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8343 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-530 Year-2018 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pawan Yadav, aged about 40 years, Gender-Male, S/o- Late Munga Lal Yadav, Resident of Village – Khaira, P.S. Sour Bazar, District-Saharsa.

¶5

Surendra Yadav, aged about 43 years, Gender-Male, S/o - Bhageshwar Yadav, Resident of Village – Khaira, P.S. Sour Bazar, District-Saharsa.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr.Sameer Ranjan For the Opposite Party : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh(App178) ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 26-04-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant

¶13

and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are languishing in custody since 22.09.2018 and 17.10.2018 respectively in a case for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 447, 504, 506/34 of the IPC. Later on, Section 302 of the IPC was also added.

¶15

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 16.09.2018 at about 9.00 A.M., Ratan Yadav having ill intention by entering into the house attempted to sexually exploit his daughter Lata Kumari, when she raised alarm, the wife of the informant rushed there and she tried to rescue her girl but she was forcefully

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8343 of 2019(3) dt.26-04-2019 2/3

¶17

pushed causing her to fell down. Afterwards Ratan Yadav went away giving threats. But again he returned from his house carrying weapons alongwith Lalan Yadav, Madan yadav, Fudan Yadav, Pawan Yadav, Surendra Yadav and Ranjit Yadav. It has been alleged that Madan Yadav gave Iron rod blow, Pawan Yadav gave Lathi blow on the wife of informant. Remaining accused persons assaulted her by fists and slaps and thereafter Surendra Yadav threw down daughter of the informant. The victim was taken to Sadar Hospital, Saharsa, from where she was referred to Darbhanga and treated at Gayatri Nursing Home where ultimately she died.

¶18

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. Co-accused Madan Yadav is alleged to have assaulted on the head of the deceased by means of Iron rod. As far as petitioners are concerned, no specific injury has been attributed against them. As per the postmortem report, cause of death is said to be ‘respiratory failure due to massive bleuoal effusion on right side’. Apparently, postmortem report does not support the manner of occurrence as alleged in

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8343 of 2019(3) dt.26-04-2019 3/3

¶20

the F.I.R.

¶21

On behalf of the learned counsels for the State and informant, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Saharsa, in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 530 of 2018.

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶24

U.K./-

¶25

U T

Pawan Yadav and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Yadav and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pravesh Yadav @ Ram Pravesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranvir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Mantosh Yadav @ Mantosh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Tahal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar