Allowed

Karu Kumar @ Karu Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jun 2019CR. MISC./26706/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court acquitted the petitioner of specific charges by releasing him on bail. The petitioner was in custody for offences under Sections 414 IPC and Arms Act sections. The court ordered his release on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding residence and cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of same amount each, subject to conditions.

Karu Kumar @ Karu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26706 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2018 Thana- MOKAMA RAIL P.S. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Karu Kumar @ Karu Mahto Son of Ramashish Nishad @ Ramashish Mahto Resident of Village- Simariya Ghat Bind Toli, P.S.- Chakiya, DistrictBegusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satrudhan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 12-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶11

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶12

One country-made pistol and cartridges were

¶13

recovered from the possession of the petitioner when the petitioner was on the railway platform. The petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2018. The petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent.

¶14

Considering the period already undergone and completion of investigation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26706 of 2019(3) dt.12-06-2019 2/2

¶16

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with G.R.P. (Rail) Mokama (Hathidah) P.S. Case No.29 of 2018, with following conditions:

¶17

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below having immovable property in his name.

¶18

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶19

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶20

Mkr./-

¶21

U T

Karu Kumar @ Karu Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karu Kumar @ Karu Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bittu Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rabindra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmesh Rai @ Dharmesh Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shahbaz Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar