Arti Devi v. Sarvan Rai
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought transfer of matrimonial case from Katihar to Begusarai due to hardship. Court denied transfer but directed husband to reimburse wife's train fare and miscellaneous expenses for attending hearings.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to travel to Katihar at her own cost; respondent to pay her second class train fare and Rs. 500 miscellaneous expenses per appearance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2563 of 2017
======================================================
Arti Devi D/o late Ganesh Mahto, R/o Shiva Ji Nagar, Bishnupur, Ward No. 40 , P.S.- Town, Dist.- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
Sarvan Rai S/o Late Surya Narayan Rai, Resident of Village- Mirchaye Bari Chawak, P.S. Nagar, Dist.- Katihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: Mr. Rama Nand Poddar, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-04-2019
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to order transfer of a matrimonial case from Katihar Family Court to Begusarai Family Court to avoid difficulty for the petitioner.
Whether to grant expenses to the wife for attending matrimonial proceedings in the husband's jurisdiction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arti Devi D/o late Ganesh Mahto
- respondent
Sarvan Rai S/o Late Surya Narayan Rai
Coram
Vikash Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court