Hon'ble Justice Sudhir Singh granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving IPC offenses and Criminal Law Amendment Act. The court imposed a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26196 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2012 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran
======================================================
Amin Sahni Son of Late Baidhnath Sahni Resident of Village - Badichak Dihi, P.S.- Maker, Distt - Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 26-08-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 144, 341, 342, 436 of the Indian Penal Code and 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act.
The prosecution case in short is that the miscreants demanded ransom amount and it is also alleged that they set the poklen of the company of the informant on fire.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 21-01-2019. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26196 of 2019(3) dt.26-08-2019 2/2
petitioner in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name transpired in this case in course of investigation.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 36 of 2012.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner qualifies for release on bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Amin Sahni
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
