Allowed

Ranjeet Datta v. The State of Bihar And Anr.

Patna HC25 Apr 2019CR. MISC./2569/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge oral order granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an alleged offence under Sections 323, 354 IPC. The court allowed the application, fixing sureties and a bail bond, aiming to prevent misuse given the land dispute.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the petition, released the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Ranjeet Datta Vs The State of Bihar And Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2569 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjeet Datta Bisho Datta @ Bishwanath Datta Village - Hasanpur, P.S.Raniganj, Dist- Araria,

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Brahmdeo Rishideo Late Kamleshwari Rishideo Vilalge- Sarwaha, P.SRaniganj , Dist- Araria

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhijeet Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 25-04-2019

¶13

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Complaint Case No. 259C/18, disclosing offences under Sections 323, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner is that he torn the cloth of wife of complainant in order to outrage her modesty.

¶15

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that with respect to same occurrence, complainant has also lodged a case under the provisions of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities), Act and as he was earlier not aware with the said case, he could not mention the same in para -3 of the petition and the allegation that has been levelled by the complainant is out and out false and concocted and in fact there is land dispute between the parties and earlier the complainant had filed a petition before the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2569 of 2019(5) dt.25-04-2019 2/2

¶17

SDO, which has been decided against the complainant and due to which, the complainant has lodged this false case.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. also as well as learned counsel for the complainant. They have opposed the prayer for bail. However, learned counsel for the complainant could not controvert the fact that there is land dispute between the parties.

¶19

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Araria, in connection with Complaint Case No. 259C/18, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

sunilkumar/-

¶22

U T

Ranjeet Datta v. The State of Bihar And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Datta v. The State of Bihar And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ramashish Paswan @ Ramashish Ram @ Ramashish Paswan Ram and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Biren Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Banti Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bihari Mandal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.