Allowed

Vikash Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC24 Apr 2019CR. MISC./80440/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a complaint case involving allegations of 498A IPC for dowry demand, subject to conditions including surrender within six weeks and cooperation in the trial.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner granted bail subject to conditions regarding surrender, bond, and cooperation in trial.

Vikash Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80440 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2018 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSiwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikash Sah S/o- Dhrupnarayan Sah, Resident of Village - Bhagwanpur, P.S.Bhagwanpur, District- Siwan.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Bihar

¶8

Sabita Devi W/o- Vikash Sah, D/o- Sriram Sah, Resident of Village - Bhagwanpur, District- Siwan At present Resident of Dalpatpur, P.S.Maharajganj, District- Siwan.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Bharat Bhushan ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 24-04-2019

¶13

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises

¶14

out of Complaint Case No. 137 of 2018, disclosing offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Petitioner happens to be husband of the complainant and allegation against him is of subjecting the complainant to torture with respect to demand of dowry of one motorcyle.

¶16

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep the complainant with himself with full honor and dignity as a wife and all the allegations levelled by the complainant is false and concocted.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

It appears that earlier notice was issued to complainant

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80440 of 2018(4) dt.24-04-2019 2/2

¶20

– opposite party no. 2 and office note discloses that opposite party no. 2 has appeared through her counsel but none has appeared on her behalf on last occasion and also on today.

¶21

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Complaint Case No. 137 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

It is further subject to the condition that petitioner shall cooperate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court below, otherwise, complainant – opposite party no. 2 shall be at liberty to move before the court below for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶23

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

sunilkumar/-

¶25

U T

Vikash Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Sah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Bambam Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mintu Mali @ Mintu Malakar and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Khobhari Mukhiya @ Khobari Mukhiya and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Ramashish Paswan @ Ramashish Ram @ Ramashish Paswan Ram and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.