The Patna High Court dismissed the Petitioner's renewed prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case alleging offences under various IPC sections and Arms Act. The Court found no reason to deviate from the earlier rejection.
The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25193 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2012 Thana- GOH DistrictAurangabad
======================================================
AJAY YADAV Son of Late Suresh Yadav @ Surendra Yadav Resident of Village - Sawan (Seema), P.S.- Pauthu, Distt.- Aurangabad, (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 01-05-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Ibrar//-
(Vikash Jain, J)
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail should be granted in the renewed petition.
Whether the earlier rejection of the anticipatory bail petition should be reconsidered.
Ajay Yadav
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
