The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail petition in an offence of murder and criminal conspiracy. The Court noted the gravity of the charge, the stage of trial, and refused bail despite the custody exceeding two years.
Bail prayer of the petitioner was dismissed; he remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12354 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2016 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
DHARMENDRA @ JHABRA @ BAGGA Son of Bhola Mahto Resident of Village - Ganipur Bejha, P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 01-05-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12354 of 2019(3) dt.01-05-2019 2/2
four months’ further time for conclusion of trial.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a case involving offences under Sections 302 and 120B/24 of the Indian Penal Code.
Whether the delay in trial and grant of bail to co-accused warrants the privilege of bail to the petitioner.
Dharmendra @ Jhabra @ Bagga
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
