The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Manjhi P.S. Case No. 93 of 2017 following charges of assault and attempt to murder, subject to specific conditions regarding surrender, sureties, and conduct during trial.
Relinquished on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23761 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2017 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== SANJAY PANDIT, aged about 45 years, male, Son of Sudarshan Pandit @ Sudarsh Pandit Resident of Village - Ekdegwak, P.S.- Manjhi, Distt.- Saran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 16-04-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23761 of 2019(2) dt.16-04-2019
2/2
to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateV, Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 93 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Pandit
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
