Remanded

Ram Haran Ram @ Rajharan Kumar Ram @ Raj Haran Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Apr 2019CR. MISC./23322/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting the petitioner provisional bail in a criminal matter involving an accusation of abetting marriage of a young girl, based on an apprehension of arrest. The court directed the petitioner to appear with the informant's daughter to verify the marriage for confirmation of bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on provisional bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including appearance with the informant's daughter within six weeks to verify marriage.

Ram Haran Ram @ Rajharan Kumar Ram @ Raj Haran Ram Vs The… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23322 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2018 Thana- JOGAPATTI DistrictWest Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAM HARAN RAM @ RAJHARAN KUMAR RAM @ RAJ HARAN RAM, aged about 23 years, male, Son of Birendra Ram Resident of Village - Bathwariya, P.S.- Jogapatti (Nawalpur), Distt - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 15-04-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 363, 366(a)/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Jogapatti (Nawalpur) P.S. Case No. 390 of xxxx2018.

¶14

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of negotiations of marriage between the informant’s daughter and the petitioner merely to put pressure as the informant apprehended that there would be delay in the marriage. It is submitted that thereafter the marriage has been solemnized between the informant’s daughter and the petitioner as acknowledged by the informant and in this regard

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23322 of 2019(2) dt.15-04-2019 2/3

¶16

the petitioner filed a petition before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶17

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Jogapatti (Nawalpur) P.S. Case No. 390 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶18

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶19

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23322 of 2019(2) dt.15-04-2019 3/3

¶23

bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶24

(v) That the petitioner shall appear before the learned Court below along with the informant’s daughter within a period of six weeks from today.

¶25

The provisional bail shall be confirmed upon verification and satisfaction by the learned Court below that the informant’s daughter and the petitioner have been married as claimed by the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to appear along with the informant’s daughter before the learned Court below or it is found that they have not been married, the provisional bail shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶26

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶27

Ibrar/BT

¶28

U T

Ram Haran Ram @ Rajharan Kumar Ram @ Raj Haran Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Haran Ram @ Rajharan Kumar Ram @ Raj Haran Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjit Rai @ Sanjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gulteni Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Prasad Singh @Nareshwar Pd. Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sahzad Alam @ Sahzad Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Singh @ Nagendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar