Allowed

Thomas Hembram @ Bablu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 May 2019CR. MISC./21985/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing an application for regular bail, the Court considered the prosecution case and the petitioner's submission regarding dispute with other accused. The petitioner, in judicial custody since September 2018, was granted bail on strict conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to cooperation in disposal of trial.

Thomas Hembram @ Bablu Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21985 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2018 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

THOMAS HEMBRAM @ BABLU Son of Lorens Hembram, Resident of Village - Taledih Mamdah, P.S.- Chandramandih, Distt.- jamui, at Present residing at Jhajha Railway Qr. no.319(B), P.S.- Jhajha, Distt.- Jamui

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prakash Mahto For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 22-05-2019 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 352 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Prosecution case is that the deceased was called by the petitioner and, thereafter, his dead body was found and informant suspects the hands of other accused persons, who have killed the deceased in collusion with the petitioner.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is dispute between the deceased and other accused persons and petitioner is only said to have called the deceased and except that there is no allegation against him and he has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion and he has been in

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21985 of 2019(3) dt.22-05-2019 2/2

¶15

judicial custody since 23.09.2018.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶17

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 352 of 2018, subject to the condition that petitioner will cooperate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court below, failing which, the prosecution shall move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶18

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶19

sunilkumar/-

¶20

U T

Thomas Hembram @ Bablu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thomas Hembram @ Bablu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Dular Singh Kharwar @ Dablu Singh Kharwar @ Ubalu Singh Kharwar and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Mamal Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Murmu @ Rajesh Hembram Vs The State of Bihar

Bale Rajbanshi @ Balo Rajbanshi Vs the State of Bihar

Shrawan Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar