The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition for anticipatory bail, finding no reason to differ from a previous order dismissing a renewal prayer for similar relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21501 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- MADHEPUR DistrictMadhubani
======================================================
JITAN MANDAL, aged about 41 years, male, Son of Late Uttim Mandal @ Late Uttim Lal Mandal Resident of Village- Laxmipur, P.S.- Madhepur, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Prafull Chandra Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
anticipatory bail in connection with Madhepur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2018 having earlier been dismissed by order dated 31.01.2019 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 76665 of 2018.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any reason to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present circumstances?
Jitan Mandal
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
