The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's third bail petition in Maniyari P.S. Case No. 35 of 2017. Having heard counsel and noting previous rejections, the Court found no reason to change its view and rejected the prayer for bail.
Bail petition dismissed; petitioner remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17964 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2017 Thana- MANIYARI DistrictMuzaffarpur
======================================================
BIPIN KUMAR aged abut 29 years, male, Son of Phuleshwar Rai Resident of Village- Sultanpur Chhaurahi P.S- Patory, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
2 10-04-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
who is in custody since 28.04.2017 and has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 35 of 2017 having earlier been rejected by orders dated 16.01.2018 and 24.08.2018 in Cr. Misc. No. 2193 of 2018 and Cr. Misc. No. 34349 of 2018, respectively.
Ibrar//-
(Vikash Jain, J)
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the third attempt after prior rejections?
Whether the petitioner's custody since April 2017 justifies a different view on bail under the law?
Bipin Kumar
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
