This oral order allowed an application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner, accused of misappropriating government money for a toilet construction scheme, claimed false implication and forgery involving her signature.
Appeal allowed; petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2143 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2018 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Neetu Devi Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai Vill-Kolhrampur, P.S-Panchrukhia Kala, Dist.-Bhojpur at Ara.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Mishra ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
4 17-04-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises
out of Barhara P.S. Case No. 239 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 406, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is of misappropriation of the Govt. money
meant for construction of Toilets under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan Scheme.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that she has falsely been implicated in this case and the construction was to be made through the Women Milk Production Cooperative Society, Phuhan, of which, co-accused Gayatri Devi is the Secretary and she has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 45198 of 2018 and being Mukhiya, the petitioner’s role was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2143 of 2019(4) dt.17-04-2019 2/2
limited in the scheme as she only had to verify as to whether the work has been done or not and by forging her signature, the report has been submitted.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 239 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
sunilkumar/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner accusing her of misappropriation of government funds.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Neetu Devi Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai
The State Of Bihar Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
