Allowed

Shambhu Narayan Rai v. The State of Bihar And Anr.

Patna HC17 Apr 2019CR. MISC./2123/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a complaint case alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bail bond with sureties under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties, subject to appearing during trial.

Shambhu Narayan Rai Vs The State of Bihar And Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2123 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1090 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shambhu Narayan Rai son of Late Badri Mahto R/o Road No. 21 in the house of Bihari Thakur, P.S.- Gardanibag, District - Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar And Anr Bihar

¶8

Dinesh Kumar Late Devnandan Singh Resident of Mohalla- Ram Jaipal Nagar, Gola Road, P.S.- Rupashpur, District- Patna

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla (App130) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 17-04-2019 Heard the parties.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1090©/2017 dated 12.4.2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation as per the complaint petition is that the complainant has entered into an agreement with the petitioner for purchase of a land on consideration money of Rs.24,25,000/and he has paid Rs.3,40,000/- to the Vaibhav Enterprises and Rs.06 lac in cash to the petitioner and in spite of that neither he has returned the money nor he has executed the sale deed after taking money.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2123 of 2019(5) dt.17-04-2019 2/3

¶16

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely been implicated in this case and whatever allegation is about payment of Rs.3,40,000/- paid to Vaibhv Enterprises, which is run by the nephew of the petitioner and secondly on the ground that though the complainant has option to move before the learned civil court for specific performance of the contract but he has filed the present case, which is not at all maintainable

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant and they have drawn my attention towards the agreement, which shows the acceptance of taking of Rs.04 lac but spite of that he is not executing the sale deed..

¶18

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No.1090©/2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that the petitioner has to appear before the learned

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2123 of 2019(5) dt.17-04-2019 3/3

¶20

court below during the trial as and when required, otherwise his bail bond shall be cancelled.

¶21

With the aforesaid observation, this application is

¶22

allowed.

¶23

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

chn/-

¶25

U T

Shambhu Narayan Rai v. The State of Bihar And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shambhu Narayan Rai v. The State of Bihar And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murlidhar Pandey Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Tej Narayan Lal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bimal Jain Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Raees Azam Siddiqui @ Tika Vs The State of Bihar

Neetu Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Prakash Sahni Vs The State of Bihar