Allowed

Md. Kasim v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2019CR. MISC./21089/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Sudhir Singh granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a case registered under Sections 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The order conditions release upon appearance and surrender within six weeks with furnishing of bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount within six weeks.

Md. Kasim Vs The State of Bihar — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21089 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2019 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Kasim Son of Late Md. Newaji Resident of Village-Bhawanipur,P.SParihar, District-Sitamarhi.

¶5

Mumtaj Khatoon Wife of Md. Kasim Resident of Village-Bhawanipur,P.SParihar, District-Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hans Lal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.N.N. Tiwari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21089 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2

¶17

petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with Parihar P.S. case No.2 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Md. Kasim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Kasim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satya Narain Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Baliram Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar

Kallu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Bhushan Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Murtza Ansari Vs The State of Bihar