Allowed

Tripurari Sharan Shrivastava v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jun 2019CR. MISC./18464/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed by accused in Paliganj PS Case No. 11/2019 challenging antecedent connected forged document allegations. Petitioner challenged less relevant technical points. Court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bond and securities subject to statutory conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two securities of like amount within four weeks.

Tripurari Sharan Shrivastava Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18464 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

TRIPURARI SHARAN SHRIVASTAVA Son of Late Upendra Narayan Resident of Laxmi Nagar, P.S.- Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga, at present B- 105 Prince Apartment, Magistrate Colony, Phulwari Sharif, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Kant Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 12-06-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP.

¶12

The land belonging to Sri Ram Janki Thakurbari Trust has stealthily been transferred in favour of other co-accused by way of forged and fabricated sale deed and on the basis thereof, it has been alleged that mutation has also been effected. Petitioner is the C.O. by whom mutation has been allowed.

¶13

Simple submission has been made at the end of petitioner is that petitioner has got no authority to challenge genuineness of the sale deed during course of mutation proceeding. Moreover, the sale-deed happens to be of the year 1987 and for that, the case has been instituted in the year 2018 irrespective of the fact that there happens to be a presumption

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18464 of 2019(4) dt.12-06-2019 2/2

¶15

with regard to registered sale deed.

¶16

Learned APP opposed the same.

¶17

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, TRIPURARI SHARAN SHRIVASTAVA, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of order, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two securities of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Danapur, Patna in connection with Paliganj PS Case No. 11/2019 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC.

¶18

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)

¶19

perwez

¶20

U T

Tripurari Sharan Shrivastava v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tripurari Sharan Shrivastava v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushma Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Jamat Ansari @ Jamat Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Raja Vs The State of Bihar

Mithlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mannu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Sah Vs The State of Bihar