Allowed

Guddu Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2019CR. MISC./18283/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral order allowing anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with a Section 387 IPC case. The High Court observed the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and was falsely implicated, granting bail for four weeks upon arrest.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to be enlarged on bail with a bond of Rs. 15,000 and two sureties within four weeks of arrest or surrender.

Guddu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18283 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2016 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

GUDDU SHARMA aged about 27 years Male, S/o Jagdeo Sharma @ Jagdeo Thakur R/O Bankat, P.S.- Kesariya, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

===================	===================	... ... Opposite Party ================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr.Patanjali Rishi
For the Opposite Party/s : ===================	Mr.Yogendra Kumar ===================	================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 04-04-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in

¶14

connection with Trial No. 939 of 2018 arising out of Mahammadpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2016 registered under Sections 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per prosecution version that one Rahul Kumar alleging that he has received a message in his mobile asking him to deposit Rs. 20 lakhs in his account which belongs to the petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has nothing to do with the alleged occurrence. However, he has no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18283 of 2019(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case whereunder the informant had received a message on his mobile from a particular number which does not belong to the petitioner asking him to deposit Rs. 20 lakhs in the account of the petitioner but in fact no money has been deposited in the account of this petitioner as also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate – I, Gopalganj, in connection with Trial No. 939 of 2018 arising out of Mahammadpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2016, subject to condition prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶20

Rajeev/-

¶21

U T

Guddu Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Sah Jaiswal @ Sunil Sah @ Sunil Kumar Jaiswal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suresh Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shila Devi Alias Sheela Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Akhileshwar Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Rajendra Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Angrahit Yadav @ Amarhit Yadav @ Amrahit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar