Single judge order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379/34 IPC. Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties was directed.
Petitioner granted bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to specific conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16316 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-471 Year-2018 Thana- MINAPUR DistrictMuzaffarpur
======================================================
Chunnu Sahani @ Gaurav Anand Son of Asharphi Sahani Resident of Village - Chand Parna, P.S.- Meenapur, District - Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni For the Opposite Party: Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 15-03-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Meenapur P.S. Case No. 471 of 2018.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16316 of 2019(2) dt.15-03-2019 2/2
petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Meenapur P.S. Case No. 471 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions:
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be granted bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to prevent apprehended arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chunnu Sahani @ Gaurav Anand
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
