This single-judge court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal trial case involving theft and criminal intimidation. The order set bail conditions and required cooperation with the investigation.
Petitioner released on bail with bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties on specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16311 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-654 Year-2018 Thana- MUFFASIL DistrictWest Champaran
======================================================
Guddu Alam Son of Ismail Mian Resident of Village - Hirapakad, Naya Tola, P.S.- Mannuapul, District - West Champaran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 15-03-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16311 of 2019(2) dt.15-03-2019 2/2
the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Muffasil (Mannuapul) P.S. Case No. 654 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions:
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in the pending trial case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Guddu Alam
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
