Allowed

Ramprit Manjhi and Ors. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Mar 2019CR. MISC./15570/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench granted bail to petitioners in a criminal case for offenses under IPC Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 and 302/34. Court relied on 25-day FIR delay and lack of antecedents. Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties ordered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount each before SDM, Bettiah.

Ramprit Manjhi and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15570 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2018 Thana- MAINATAND District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAMPRIT MANJHI Son of Nageshwar Manjhi Resident of Village - Chiutaha, P.S.- Mainatand, District - West Champaran

¶5

Surendra Manjhi Son of Nageshwar Manjhi Resident of Village - Chiutaha, P.S.- Mainatand, District - West Champaran

¶6

Munna Manjhi Son of Nageshwar Manjhi Resident of Village - Chiutaha, P.S.- Mainatand, District - West Champaran

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are in custody in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 104 of 2018 for the offenses under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Referring to the prosecution case he submits that after 25 days of the occurrence, the present case was registered at the instance of the informant. The petitioners is in custody since 7.11.2018.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15570 of 2019(2) dt.13-03-2019 2/2

¶17

Considering the fact that there is delay of 25 days in lodging the case and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent , let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 104 of 2018.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶19

spandey/-

¶20

U T

Ramprit Manjhi and Ors. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramprit Manjhi and Ors. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prof. Girindra Mohan Mishra Works As Reader In C. M. Science College, Darbhanga Vs The Vice-Chancellor( Sri S. Kushwaha )

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddi Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Bishnu Ram @ Vishnu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Sri Ram Krishna Prasad Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Paswan @ Mr. Karan Vs The State of Bihar