The High Court of Patna denied bail to the petitioner due to the victim's statement. The High Court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within six months.
Bail rejected; trial to be concluded within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15156 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar *
======================================================
GUDDI MISHRA, Son of Late Tarkeshwar Mishra, Resident of VillageBadkagaon (Man Singh Patti), P.S.- Buxar (I), District- Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 12-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the statement of the victim in her examination, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of bail is rejected.
However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of six months.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uday/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in light of the victim's statement.
Whether the trial court should be directed to conclude the trial within a specific timeframe.
Guddi Mishra
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
