Allowed

Ratish Kumar Jha v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC6 May 2019CR. MISC./13891/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act was allowed. The court noted that the dispute between the parties was resolved through mediation. The petitioner was ordered to surrender and be granted regular bail subject to mediation terms.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to surrender and granted regular bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties.

Ratish Kumar Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13891 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2017 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ratish Kumar Jha Son of Late Nasib Narayan Jha Resident of Village - Dhadhi, P.S.- Nanpur, District - Sitamarhi, at present B-11, 2nd Floor Street No.3, West Binod Nagar, Delhi-110092

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Rani Jha Wife of Ratish Kumar Jha Resident of Village - Dhadhi, P.S.Nanpur, District - Sitamarhi, at present 43B, 1st floor SRC, Shipra Riviera Apartment, Indra Puram, Ghaziabad (U.P)

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 06-05-2019

¶13

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in

¶14

connection with Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 143 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶15

Case is under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. and it appears that after appearance of opposite party no.2, the case was sent to Mediation Committee vide order dated 06.03.2019 and it appears from Mediator’s report, which is at Flag ‘M’, that the dispute between the parties have been resolved through the process of mediation and the terms of settlement mutually agreed upon the parties.

¶16

Heard learned APP as well as learned counsel for the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13891 of 2019(3) dt.06-05-2019 2/2

¶18

opposite party no.2, they have not controverted the above fact.

¶19

Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, surrender before the court below on 03.06.2019 and on that date, opposite party no.2 shall also remain present and both the parties will abide by terms of agreement which is attached with Mediator’s report, and on surrender, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Darbhanga, in connection with Manigachhi P.S. Case No. 143 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

Let a copy of the Mediator’s report along with the memorandum of agreement be sent to the learned court below for needful.

¶21

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶22

Amjad/-

¶23

U T

Ratish Kumar Jha v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ratish Kumar Jha v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Kashim Vs The State of Bihar

Niteshwar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Nand Kishore Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Bind @ Upendra Kumar and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Kumar Chaorasiya Vs The State of Bihar