Allowed

Jitendra @ Arvind Kumar @ Sadhu Mahto and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 May 2019CR. MISC./13573/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna allowed an application for anticipatory bail in an IPC and Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act case, granting release on bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of the like amount if arrested or surrender within six weeks.

Jitendra @ Arvind Kumar @ Sadhu Mahto and Anr. Vs The State… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13573 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-941 Year-2018 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JITENDRA @ ARVIND KUMAR @ SADHU MAHTO and ANR Son of Late Keshari Mahto Residents of Mohalla Chhoti Pahari Jakariyapur, P.S.Agamkuan, District - Patna.

¶5

Chitranjan Mahto Son of Nanhak Mahto @ Laldhari Mahto, Wife of Nageshwar Singh Residents of Mohalla Chhoti Pahari Jakariyapur, P.S.Agamkuan, District- Patna.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rohit Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 14-05-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises

¶12

out of Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 941/18, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 354(a), 385, 504, 506 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 37 (C) of Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

Allegation as per F.I.R. that petitioners came on the stage in drunken condition and started dancing with the informant, who is orchestra dancer and also used vulgar language.

¶14

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and except the allegation that the climb on the stage and started dancing, there

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13573 of 2019(5) dt.14-05-2019 2/2

¶16

is no further allegation.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise, Patna, in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 941/18, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

This is further subject to the condition that they will cooperate in investigation of the case and will appear as and when required by the police, except on showing genuine reasons.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

sunilkumar/-

¶22

U T

Jitendra @ Arvind Kumar @ Sadhu Mahto and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra @ Arvind Kumar @ Sadhu Mahto and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Verma @ Sanjay Kr. Verma Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Kumar @ Gopal Singh and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Farooque Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramnath @ Chirkut Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Navin Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Lallan Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar