Allowed

Mahesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 May 2019CR. MISC./13295/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a case involving kidnapping offences, the High Court granted regular bail to the accused upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties, allowing the petitioner's release. The petition questioned the prosecution version of kidnapping versus the victim's recovery from a bus stand.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Mahesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13295 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-466 Year-2018 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran

¶3

====================================================== MAHESH SINGH Son of Bodhi Singh Resident of Village - Konhiya, P.S.Kesaria, Distt.- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 20-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kesaria P.S.Case no.466 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363, 365, 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Prosecution story of kidnapping of the minor victim girl of the informant by the petitioner.

¶12

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though in her statement recorded under Seciton 164 Cr.P.C. she has stated about kidnapping by the petitioner but earlier actually she was recovered from the Bus Stand by the police, which will ape par from para 19 of the case diary and in para 4 of the case diary she has stated that she has made

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13295 of 2019(5) dt.20-05-2019 2/2

¶14

allegation on the information supplied by one Gautam Devi wife of Hagen Singh with whom the petitioner has civil dispute and the title suit is going in . The petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2018.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶16

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Motihari in connection with Kesaria P.S.Case No.466 of 2018.

¶17

With the above direction, this application is allowed.

¶18

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶19

chn/- U T

Mahesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saroj Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shashi Kumar and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs the State of Bihar

Rajo Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Amrendra Kumar Jaiswal @ Amrendra Prasad Jaiswal @ Amrendra Kr. Pd. Jaiswal Vs The State of Bihar

Dina Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar