Allowed

Indal Ravidas @ Indal Kumar @ Karan @ Indal Ravisad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2019CR. MISC./12661/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar allowed bail to the petitioner in a case under Section 366(A) IPC. The court noted the victim's statement indicated no protest, implying consent, though no formal withdrawal was alleged. Bail granted with bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount, conditioned on residence in territorial jurisdiction and cooperation with trial, with liberty to cancel bond on defa

Indal Ravidas @ Indal Kumar @ Karan @ Indal… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12661 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2018 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Indal Ravidas @ Indal Kumar @ Karan @ Indal Ravisad, Son of Mohan Ravidas. Resident of Village- Burh Paraiya, P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya. Represented by Mohan Ravidas aged about 54 years, Male, Son of Babulal Ravidas, resident of Village- Budh Paraiya, P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya natural guardian and father of petitioner.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 08-05-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Though the victim girl has alleged that petitioner, Indal Ravidas @ Indal Kumar @ Karan @ Indal Ravisad had kidnapped her but her entire statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure would reveal that she was a consenting party because she never made protest against the act of the petitioner. Nothing more is alleged against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 20.07.2018.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 12661 of 2019(3) dt.08-05-2019 2/2

¶15

Investigation of the case is complete.

¶16

Hence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Paraiya Police Station Case No.112 of 2018, subject to condition that both the bailors shall be resident of within the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶17

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶18

abhishek/-

¶19

U T

Indal Ravidas @ Indal Kumar @ Karan @ Indal Ravisad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indal Ravidas @ Indal Kumar @ Karan @ Indal Ravisad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Singh @ Arun Kumar Sinha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lalo Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nasim Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rustam Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Bind Vs The State Of Bihar