The High Court of Patna dismissed the criminal appeal as withdrawn by the appellant, who sought leave to challenge the underlying order under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.676 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2018 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
RAJESH KUMAR @ RAJESH KR. PASWAN Son of Brahmdeo Paswan Resident of Village - Deharnia, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District - Bhagalpur.
... ... Appellant/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ajay Mukherjee, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks withdrawal
of the instant memo of appeal in order to challenge the judgment impugned under Articles 226, 227 of the Constitution of India in the background of prohibition having under Section 375 CrPC over maintainability of the appeal as well as eclipsing the revisional power in the background of the facts of the case.
With the aforesaid liberty, instant memo of appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kr. Paswan
The State of Bihar and Anr
Priti Kumari
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
