Dismissed

Shiv Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Feb 2019CR. APP (SJ)/4784/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble J. Birendra Kumar dismissed the appeal for bail. Noting the grave nature of the rape allegation against a Dalit accused, the Court refused to review the earlier refusal, directed expedited trial completion within nine months, and dismissed the appeal. No further bail is granted.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail refused; appeal dismissed; direction to expedite trial within nine months.

Shiv Singh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4784 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhabhua (Kaimur)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shiv Singh Yadav Son of Ram Sakal Yadav, Resident of Village - Khamkala, P.S.- Adhaura, District – Kaimur, Bhabua

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

¶10

Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, SPP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date : 06-02-2019

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1^st , Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with SC/ST Reg. No.19 of 2018, arising out of Mahila (Bhabua) Police Station Case No.08 of 2018, registered under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(1)(w) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

¶16

Allegation against the appellant is that he ravished to the informant. The informant has already been examined during the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4784 of 2018 dt.06-02-2019 2/2

¶18

course of trial. Earlier this Court had refused prayer vide Annexure-1.

¶19

Considering the stage of the trial and nature of allegation, this Court is not inclined to review the earlier order. Hence, the prayer for bail is refused. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within nine months.

¶20

Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.

¶21

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶22

Mkr./Banti-

¶23

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	07.02.2019
Transmission Date	07.02.2019

Shiv Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Singh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Prasad Madaiya @ Ram Prasad Munda and Anr. Vs The Union Of India, Through The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur

Md. Sahadat @ Chhotu and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Chandrama Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Prasad Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Manjhi @ Littu Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

The Managing Director, Vastu Bihar Through Vinay Kumar Tiwary Vs Jitendra Mohan Sahay and Ors.