Allowed

Md. Sahadat @ Chhotu and Ors. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Feb 2019CR. MISC./6635/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners facing charges under various sections of the IPC, ordering release bail-bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties, subject to cooperation with investigation under Section 438 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail by executing bail bonds of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties, subject to cooperation with investigation.

Md. Sahadat @ Chhotu and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6635 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2018 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Md. Sahadat @ Chhotu, aged about 22 years (Male), Son of Md. Hashim

¶5

Md. Leyakat, aged about 24 years (Male), Son of Md. Hashim

¶6

Shahjahan Khatoon @ Shahjahan, aged about 40 years (Female), wife of Hashim

¶7

Asgari @ Asgari Khatoon, (Female), aged about years, Daughter of Md. Hashim All resident of Village - Bulan Sarai, P.S. Bidhupur, District- Vaishali (Hazipur) ... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 05-02-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 337, 338, 307, 448, 354 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Submission is that allegation against the petitioners is general and omnibus. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6635 of 2019(2) dt.05-02-2019 2/2

¶18

from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bidhupur Police Station Case No. 398 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶19

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶20

Kundan/Rajan

¶21

U T

Md. Sahadat @ Chhotu and Ors. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Sahadat @ Chhotu and Ors. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Narayan Sada Vs Union Of India Through The General Manager, N.e. Railway, Gorakhpur

Geeta Devi and Ors. Vs Asha Devi and Ors.

Pappu Paswan @ Arvind Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Prasad Madaiya @ Ram Prasad Munda and Anr. Vs The Union Of India, Through The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur

Chandrama Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Dilram Ram and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar