staying at her maika since one year prior to the occurrence. She begotten her son at her maika . Her husband was in custody relating to a dacoity case. She has further stated that she has got two issues, a daughter aged about 4 years namely Manisha and Rahul, son aged about 5 months. She has further stated that neither her husband nor her father has animosity with others. In para 14, she has stated that at the time of occurrence, it was dark night but there was electric light in her maika . In para 17, she has stated that when her child was snatched from her, she raised alarm. 15-20 persons came hearing her alarm, she has named Fantu Manjhi, Ram Ashray Manjhi, Kunti Devi, daughter in law of Kunti Devi in para 17, she has stated that she along with her parents had tried to apprehend the accused but could not succeed. In Para 19, she has stated that on the following morning at about 7 AM they reached at police station to lodge the case. In para 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25, there happens to be cross-examination with regard to place of residence of the accused, distance in between her sasural as well as village of the accused, manner of identification. She has further stated that she had seen the accused twice before the occurrence while she was staying. In para 26, attention has been drawn towards the previous statement over electric light available at the time of occurrence. In para 27, she has stated that both the accused have
