The Court disposed of four Letters Patent Appeals challenging orders related to forest matters, holding that the legal issues were already concluded by a Larger Bench decision.
None; appeals disposed with liberty to approach District Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.45 of 2017 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12834 of 2016
======================================================
Ravi Kumar Patel Son of Ram Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Pranpur Mahrodh, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Letters Patent Appeal No. 35 of 2017 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10246 of 2016
======================================================
Ravi Kant Singh son of Brij Bihari Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Gaurakshani, Sasaram, Police Station - Sasaram, District - Rohtas.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Letters Patent Appeal No. 34 of 2017 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9865 of 2016
====================================================== Yogendra Kumar Singh son of Ram Niwas Singh, Resident of Village - Radhakhand, P.S. - Bhagwanpur, District - Kaimur, At present Resident of Plot No. 309, 310/2, Shiv Govardhan Lanka, Varanasi U.P..
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Patna High Court L.P.A No.45 of 2017(3) dt.15-03-2019 2/3
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Letters Patent Appeal No. 7 of 2017 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18323 of 2016
======================================================
Ajay Choudhary son of L.T.B. Choudhary Resident of Village - Basantpur Chougai, Police Station - Chougai, District - Buxar, At present residing at Choubeypur, Varanasi Uttar Pradesh.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sarvesh Kumar Singh- Aag13
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
It is pointed out that the issue raised in these appeals
are now concluded by the decision of the Larger Bench vide judgement dated 1st of November, 2018 that has been incorporated and followed by our Division Bench in the case of Baleshwar Roy Vs. State of Bihar & Ors, 2019 (2) BLJ 147.
Patna High Court L.P.A No.45 of 2017(3) dt.15-03-2019 3/3
Consequently, in view of what has already been held, we dispose of these appeals with liberty to the appellants to approach the concerned District Magistrate for passing an appropriate order within six weeks provided the appellants furnish the security bond to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, who shall pass the order in relation to the release or otherwise.
In the event the matter of confiscation is pending before the Divisional Forest Officer/Authorized Officer or before the concerned Secretary of the Department before whom the revision is pending they shall pass appropriate orders within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order.
Accordingly, the appeals stand disposed of.
(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ)
( Anjana Mishra, J)
Saif/Jagdish/-
U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Baleshwar Roy Vs. State of Bihar & OrsReferred¶55
Baleshwar Roy Vs. State of Bihar & Ors, 2019 (2) BLJ 147
Ravi Kumar Patel
Ravi Kant Singh
Yogendra Kumar Singh
Ajay Choudhary
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Forest Department
The District Magistrate, Rohtas
Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
