Disposed

Raj Nandan Prasad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Patna HC26 Sept 2018MJC/3470/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner alleged disobedience of an earlier court order directing the University to pass a reasoned order and make payment if due. The Court found a calculation chart was provided but a reasoned order was not. It directed the University to pass the reasoned order within two weeks and disposed of the application.

What did the court decide?

The University was directed to pass a reasoned order within two weeks.

Raj Nandan Prasad Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3470 of 2016

¶3

¶4

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13943 of 2015

¶5

===========================================================

¶6

Raj Nandan Prasad Gupta, Son of Late Ram Kripal Gupta, resident of village - Dharamganj, Vivekanand Nagar, Ward No. 28, P.O. + P.S. - Kishanganj, District - Kishanganj. Bihar.

¶7

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through Sri R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

Dr. Binod Kumar, Vice- Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura, Bihar.

¶10

Dr. Kumaresh Prasad Singh, Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura, Bihar.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s

¶12

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶14

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶15

Date: 26-09-2018

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and B.N.

¶17

Mandal University (hereinafter referred to as the ‘University’).

¶18

The petitioner has moved the Court alleging disobedience of the order dated 28.03.2016 passed in C.W.J.C No.

¶19

13943 of 2015.

¶20

From the materials on record, it appears that the Court had given liberty to the petitioner to file a representation and the University was to dispose off the same by a reasoned order and further if any payment was found due, the same was also to be paid.

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.3470 of 2016 dt.26-09-2018

¶22

2/2

¶23

Show cause has been filed on behalf of the

¶24

opposite parties no. 2 and 3.

¶25

At the very outset, learned counsel for the University submitted that though a reasoned order has not been passed, but the calculation chart has been given to the petitioner and nothing has been pointed out to dispute the same in terms of the order of the Court.

¶26

Having perused the materials on record, the Court finds that the contention of learned counsel for the University is correct. However, as there was specific direction for passing a reasoned order, let the same be done within two weeks and copy given to the petitioner.

¶27

The application stands disposed off.

¶28

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶29

N.H./- Ranjeet/-

¶30

AFR/NAFR U

Raj Nandan Prasad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Nandan Prasad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prof. Mahendra Prasad Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Udar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lalmuni Devi Vs Jai Prakash University Chapra and Ors.

Babita Prabhakar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.