The High Court at Patna disposed of a miscellaneous jurisdiction case arising from a writ petition as withdrawn upon application withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner.
The miscellaneous application is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2040 of 2016
Arising out of
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10113 of 2011
===========================================================
Ram Udar Chaudhary, son of Late Laksheshwar, Resident of Vachaspati Nagar, P.O- Mahendru, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Patna, Bihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jay Prakash Sharma and Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 26-09-2018
Mr. Jay Prakash Sharma, learned counsel submitted that he has been asked by Mr. Kumar Kaushik, learned counsel on record for the petitioner to withdraw the application.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U
Ram Udar Chaudhary
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Anjani Kumar Singh
Rajiv Prasad Singh Ranjan
Sanjay Kumar
Anand Kishor
Usha Chaudhary
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
