Dismissed

Gayatri Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC14 Sept 2018MJC/2179/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-paragraph oral order disposing of a contempt petition. The Chief Justice held that since promotions had been granted, the petitioner lacks merit, and any grievance can be challenged by appropriate proceedings. The petition was disposed of without analysis.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was disposed off; no specific relief granted as the merit was rejected.

Gayatri Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2179 of 2016 In

¶2

Letters Patent Appeal No.985 of 1996

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gayatri Kumari wife of Shri Baidyanath Kunwar, resident of village – Bharaul, Police Station – Bachhawara, District – Begusarai at present posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Government Middle School Narepur, Block – Bachhawara, District – Begusarai

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar through Mr. G. S. Gangwar, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Mr. Ramchandra Tuddu, the Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna

¶9

Mr. Naushad Yusuf, The District Magistrate, Begusarai

¶10

Smt. Usha Kumari, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger Division, Munger

¶11

Mr. Dinesh Safi, the District Education Officer, Begusarai

¶12

Mr. Dhananjay Upadhyay, the District Programme Officer (Establishemnt), Begusarai

¶13

Smt. Sangita Kumari, the Block Education Officer, Bachhawara, District – Begusarai

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. A.K. Sinha, GA-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶16

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶17

2 14-09-2018 It is reported that promotions have already been

¶18

granted.

¶19

However, it is the case of the petitioner that she has not been granted promotion and in fact she has already attained the age of superannuation.

¶20

If the petitioner has any grievance with respect to

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.2179 of 2016(2) dt.14-09-2018 2/2

¶22

non-grant of promotion, it will be open to challenge the same before appropriate Court by way of appropriate proceeding.

¶23

With this observation, the present contempt petition

¶24

stands disposed off.

¶25

(Mukesh R. Shah, CJ)

¶26

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶27

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶28

skm/-

¶29

Gayatri Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gayatri Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musafir Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bishwanath Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shiv Shankar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Kumar Gandhi Vs Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Gangwar and Ors.

Gokul Prasad Agrawal Vs The State Of Bihar Through Shri Deepak Kumar, The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Subhash Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Bihar, P