The High Court at Patna dismissed an application under Section 24 CPC for transferring a criminal case as completely misconceived and not maintainable, allowing no further time.
Application under Section 24 CPC for transfer of criminal case dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2478 of 2018
======================================================
Dipankar Priya, wife of Dipak Kumar Chaudhary, resident of house of Sri Prem Nath Singh, Hilsa, P.S.-Hilsa, District-Nalanda and D/O Dev Chandra Chaudhary, resident of mohalla-East Lohanipur, P.S.-Kadamkuan, DistrictPatna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Sri Dipak Kumar Chaudhary, resident of village-Kanhaiaganj, P.S.-Angari, District-Nalanda, at present house of Sri Prem Nath Singh, Hilsa, P.S.Hilsa, District-Nalanda.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 23-08-2018 This seems to be a completely misconceived
application as the petitioner has filed the same under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of a criminal case arising out of Hilsa P.S. Case No.208 of 2017.
The application is dismissed in limine.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Arvind/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application filed under Section 24 CPC for transfer of a criminal case is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dipankar Priya
Dipak Kumar Chaudhary
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
