Allowed
Rinku Devi v. The Union Of India
Patna HCMJC/1618/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1618 of 2016
====================================================== Rinku Devi
.... .... Petitioner Versus The Union of India .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anant Kumar-1, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
5 23-02-2018 Having heard the parties and considering the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, the same is allowed and M.A.No. 240 of 2014 is restored to its original records, subject to the petitioner removing the defects by filing a limitation petition within four weeks.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Shashi.
U
Rinku Devi
The Union of India
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court