In a criminal miscellaneous application, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The Court on its own motion granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application was granted; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1042 of 2016
In
Cr. WJC 516 of 2006
====================================================== Mahendra Sah @ Mahendra Shah, son of Late Sheo Narayan Sah, Resident of village- Sonbarsa, Police Station- Nawanagar, District- Buxar.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
All sons of Late Chandradeep Singh, Residents of village -Sohai, Police Station- Agiaon Bazar, District- Bhojpur.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rahul Nath For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kinkar Kumar
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 20-08-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset,
seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Learned counsel for the State is present.
Permission is granted. The application is dismissed
as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Arvind/-
U
Mahendra Sah @ Mahendra Shah
The State of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
