This is an oral order in a writ petition filled under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Court was informed that a Parwana issued in the name of the petitioner had been complied with. Satisfied that the contempt application is not fit to proceed, the application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.370 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12560 of 2007
======================================================
Nandu Paswan, Son of Lakhan Paswan resident of Village- Tinere, Gopalpur, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
Parwana in the name of Nandu Paswan, the order of this Court has now been complied with. Annexure-B to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4 is the copy of Parwana shown to have been issued in the name of Nandu Paswan.
This Court is satisfied that this contempt application is not fit to proceed and it is accordingly, dismissed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
avin/- U
Nandu Paswan
The State of Bihar
Sanjay Kumar Agrawal
Sheo Ranjan
Sandeep Kumar
Sheo Lakhan Singh
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
