The High Court of Patna dismissed a miscellaneous appeal withdrawn by the appellant who stated that compensation had already been paid to the claimants.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.585 of 2014
======================================================
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Patna
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Renu Pathak & Ors.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Singh Vikram For the Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal submitting that appellant has already made payment of the compensation to the claimants and does not want to pursue this appeal in future.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
mantreshwar/-
U
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Patna
Renu Pathak
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
