An appeal where the appellant failed to appear. The court allowed liberty to file an application under Article 227 based on the Full Bench judgment in Neelam Kumari Sinha versus Prashant Kumar and disposed of the appeal.
Liberty to file a proper application under Article 227 if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.280 of 2018
======================================================
Mukesh Kumar Prasad son of Sri Yogendra Prasad resident of B-38/240, B- Block, New Ashok Nagar Delhi, Police Station- Maurya Vihar Phase-I, New Delhi. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Kumari Shweta wife of Mukesh Kumar Prasad, daughter of Bala Prasad, resident of Mohalla-Shital Tola, Police Station-Ara Town, District Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr.Mrigendra Pratap Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)
4 01-02-2019
None appears on behalf of the appellant.
Despite time being granted vide order passed on 09.10.2018 to convert this appeal to an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the Full Bench opinion rendered in the case of Neelam Kumari Sinha versus Prashant Kumar reported in 2010(3)PLJR 632 yet order has not been carried out. On call today, none appears to press this appeal.
We are persuaded to dispose of this appeal with liberty to the petitioner if so advised, to file a proper application in terms of the Full Bench judgment to question the order put to challenge in this appeal.
This appeal is disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
( Arvind Srivastava, J)
Bibhash/- U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Neelam Kumari Sinha versus Prashant KumarReferred¶14
2010(3)PLJR 632
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Prasad
Kumari Shweta
Jyoti Saran
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
