Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This court corrected the station of two respondents in the memo of parties in a writ petition, modifying an earlier order to reflect the District of Arwal.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to correct the station of respondents Nos. 2 and 4 in the memo of parties to read as 'Arwal' instead of 'Saran', modifying a prior order dated 20.12.2018.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14026 of 2018
======================================================
Anil Kumar , son of Ram Pal, Resident of H. No. 156, Near Govt. Senior Secondary School, Near Chopal, Chamar Khera, District-Hisar, StateHaryana.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
- The State of Bihar through the Excise Commissioner, Government of Bihar Patna.
- The District Magistrate cum Collector, District- Arwal.
- The Superintendent of Police (SP), Arwal.
- The Excise Superintendent, District – Arwal.
- The Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station- Mahendiya, DistrictArwal.
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anil Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar through the Excise Commissioner, Government of Bihar Patna
- respondent
The District Magistrate cum Collector, District- Arwal
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police (SP), Arwal
- respondent
The Excise Superintendent, District – Arwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court