This order directs respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's grievance regarding the height of a road in Village Senduari, referring to a previous order, before disposing of the matter.
Directed to consider the petitioner's grievance and decide the issue in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8241 of 2018
======================================================
Jagannath Prasad, S/o Chandra Dev Prasad Sharma, R/o Village- Senduari, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha- AAG 7
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
3 19-07-2018 Seeking a direction to the respondents for not raising the height of the road, which is to be constructed in the village Senduari under Hajipur Block in the district of Vaishali under a Yojana being No.3/2017-18, this writ petition has been filed and it is pointed out that if the height of the road is not reduced it would create nuisance to the public at large. Placing reliance on certain orders of this Court in CWJC No.4839 of 2010 (Deepak Mukherjee Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), it is argued that identical directions be issued in the matter.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8241 of 2018(3) dt.19-07-2018 2/2
Keeping in view the grievance of the petitioner, it is directed that the respondents authorities may look into the grievance of the petitioner and after taking note of the order passed in the case of Deepak Mukherjee (supra), proceed to decide the issue in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the matter stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Sunil/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents were directed to consider the petitioner's grievance regarding road height based on a previous order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Deepak Mukherjee Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.Referred¶22
CWJC No.4839 of 2010 (Deepak Mukherjee Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.)
Jagannath Prasad
The State of Bihar
The Collector, Vaishali
The Chief Executive Officer-cum-Deputy Development Commissioner, Zila Parishad, Vaishali
The Executive Engineer, Zila Parishad, Vaishali
The Junior Engineer, Zila Parishad, Vaishali
Rajendra Menon
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
