Oral order dismissing a writ petition challenging the Shiksha Mitra issue. The court held the matter is a closed chapter per a Full Bench judgment and found the petition devoid of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7979 of 2012
======================================================
Kumari Krishna W/O Hardeo Yadav R/O Village- Bhacchi, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishal Sauravh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GA 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 25-10-2018
In view of the judgment of the Full Bench in the case of Kalpana Rani vs. State of Bihar & Ors. [2014 (2) PLJR 665] the issue of Shiksha Mitra is now a closed chapter and as such no indulgence can be granted in the present writ petition.
This writ petition is completely devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
mrl./-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant relief in the writ petition regarding the Shiksha Mitra issue.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kalpana Rani vs. State of Bihar & Ors.Explained¶18
Kalpana Rani vs. State of Bihar & Ors. [2014 (2) PLJR 665]
Kumari Krishna W/O Hardeo Yadav
The State Of Bihar Through Member District Education Appellate Tribunal
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
