Disposed

Bindu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC12 Oct 2018CWJC/23422/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a six-year pending writ petition regarding service or pension grievances, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority with a direction to condone delay for expedited consideration.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Appellate Authority within one month, with a direction to condone delay for expedited disposal.

Bindu Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23422 of 2012

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bindu Kumari W/O Shri Balbir Kumar Resident Of Village - Masti Fatehpur, P.O. - Bhairwar, Via - Mirzapur, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Begusarai

¶4

... ... Petitioner/S

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Collector, District - Begusarai

¶9

The District Superintendent Of Education, District - Begusarai

¶10

The District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Begusarai Through Its Presiding Officer

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Begusarai

¶12

The Block Education Extension Officer, Begusarai

¶13

Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj - Bhairwar, P.O. - Bhairwar, Via - Mirzapur, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Begusarai

¶14

Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj - Bhairwar, P.O. - Bhairwar, Via - Mirzapur, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Begusarai

¶15

Smita Kumari D/O Shri Ram Pravesh Yadav Resident Of : Village - Kaithma, P.O. - Badalpura, P.S. - Mufassil, District - Begusarai

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhu Prasun For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG 14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶18

3 12-10-2018

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶20

counsel appearing for the State.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the State Appellate Authority is available appellate forum. In that view of the matter, he submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority so that her grievance may be properly considered.

¶22

Considering the above, the writ petition is disposed of

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.23422 of 2012(3) dt.12-10-2018 2/2

¶24

with liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Appellate Authority. In case an appeal is filed before the Appellate Authority within one month from today along with a copy of this order, the Appellate Authority is required to consider and dispose of the same expeditiously after condoning the delay in view of the fact that the present application remained pending in this Court for six years.

¶25

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed

¶26

of.

¶27

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶28

mrl./-

¶29

Bindu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bindu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bibha Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Shiv Pd. Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr.kameshwar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Newa Lal Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Dehtesam Anwar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanoj Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.