Disposed

M/s Bihar Medico, Proprietor Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC12 Apr 2018CWJC/6613/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Section 22(1) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Justice Vikash Jain directed the Assistant Drug Controller to expeditiously consider and dispose of the petitioner's outstanding representation after affording a hearing, preferably within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Assistant Drug Controller to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.02.2018 after hearing, within eight weeks.

M/s Bihar Medico, Proprietor Ravi Kumar Vs The State Of… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.6613 of 2018 dt.12-04-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6613 of 2018

¶4

=========================================================== M/s Bihar Medico, Proprietor Ravi Kumar S/o Late Baleshwar Lal, Premises situated at C-8 1st Floor, Uday Place Gobind Mitra Road, Patna, R/o Puspa Bhawan, S.P. Ghosh Lane, G.M. Road, P.S. - Pirbahore, District - Patna.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The State Drug Controller-cum-Chief Licensing Authority, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Assistant Drug Controller, Drug Control Administration, Patna, 4th Floor, NMCH, Campus Kankarbagh, Patna - 20.

¶9

.... .... Respondents

¶10

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Shankar Das, Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, GA-10

¶11

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-04-2018

¶12

The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to release the drugs seized by the Inspector of Drugs in exercise of power under Section 22(1) of the Drugs and Cosmetis Act, 1940; and for connected reliefs.

¶13

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if the petitioner’s representation dated 06.02.2018 (Annexure-17) filed before the Assistant Drug Controller, Drug Control Administration, NMCH, Patna (Respondent No. 3) is directed to be disposed of, in which event, the present writ petition need not be pressed on merits.

¶14

Patna High Court CWJC No.6613 of 2018 dt.12-04-2018

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondents appears and has

¶16

been heard.

¶17

Having regard to the nature of the grievances and the stand of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Assistant Drug Controller, Drug Control Administration, NMCH, Patna (Respondent No. 3) to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 06.02.2018 (Annexure-17), if the same is pending before him, after grant of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment.

¶18

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶19

Md. Ibrarul/BT

¶20

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	17.04.2018
Transmission Date	N.A.

M/s Bihar Medico, Proprietor Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Bihar Medico, Proprietor Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Maa And Company Proprietor Ajay Kumar Vs Bank Of Baroda and Ors.

M/s Mangalam Automobiles Vs U C O Bank Through Its Zonal Manager and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Vs The Bank Of Baroda and Ors.

M/s. Raushan Raj Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Tanu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.